What 2 Warnings Did Washington Give to the People of the United States in His Farewell Address?
In 1796, every bit his second term in office drew to a shut, President George Washington chose not to seek re-election. Mindful of the precedent his conduct gear up for futurity presidents, Washington feared that if he were to dice while in office, Americans would view the presidency equally a lifetime appointment. Instead, he decided to step down from ability, providing the standard of a ii-term limit that would eventually be enshrined in the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution.
Washington informed the American people of his retirement in a public letter that would come to be known as his "Adieu Address." James Madison had written a draft in 1792 when Washington had contemplated retiring after his starting time term. Retaining only the outset few paragraphs of Madison's version, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton conducted an all-encompassing rewrite, with Washington providing the final edits. Philadelphia'southward American Daily Advertiser published the accost on September 19, 1796.1
Washington began his accost by explaining his choice not to seek a third term as president. Washington revealed that he had hoped to retire prior to the previous election, but refrained due to the "critical posture of our affairs with foreign nations," referring to the escalation of tensions with Great Uk over its state of war with France. Merely with that crisis passed, Washington assured the country that his leadership was no longer needed. The republic would be rubber in the hands of a new president.2
Having done his all-time to assuage fear, Washington then offered his final counsel to the people equally their president. He stressed the importance of the Wedlock that bonded all Americans together and provided for their freedom and prosperity. He reminded them that the "independence and liberty" the nation currently enjoyed was the result of the "common dangers, sufferings, and successes" they had experienced together in the American Revolution and early years of the democracy. To safeguard their hard-won system of republican government in a federal union, the country had to remain united.3
He cautioned against three interrelated dangers that threatened to destroy the Union: regionalism, partisanship, and foreign entanglements. He warned his countrymen non to let regional loyalties overwhelm national attachments: "The name of American…must ever exalt the but pride of patriotism more than than whatsoever appellation derived from local discriminations." At this time, many Americans primarily identified with their state or region, but Washington reminded the citizenry not to allow such attachments to split up them, lest "designing men" convince them that differing local interests made the Union unworkable or unnecessary.4
In particular, Washington feared that geographic identities would serve every bit the foundation for the evolution of political parties. Indeed, this process had already begun with the emergence of the New England Federalists and Southern Democratic-Republicans. While nosotros currently view partisanship as inseparable from the American political procedure, in the early on republic, near condemned parties as divisive, disruptive, and the tools of demagogues seeking power.5 "Factionalism," as contemporaries called it, encouraged the electorate to vote based on political party loyalty rather than the common good. Washington feared that partisanship would lead to a "spirit of revenge" in which party men would non govern for the skilful of the people, but only to obtain and maintain their grip on ability. Equally a result, he warned Americans to guard against would-be despots who would use parties as "stiff engines…to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government."vi
The greatest danger to the Wedlock, though, stemmed from the combination of factionalism and external invasion. Washington explained that partisanship "open up[ed] the door to foreign influence and abuse" considering it weakened voters' abilities to brand reasoned and disinterested choices. Rather than choosing the best men for office, the people would base decisions on "ill-founded jealousies and false alarms," and then elect those in league with foreign conspirators. To avoid outside interference, Washington advocated a foreign policy based on neutrality and friendly commercial relations with all.seven
Washington concluded his address with some brief musings on his legacy. Given his xl-five years of service, he hoped that his countrymen would view his past mistakes "with indulgence" and that history would relegate them "to oblivion." He closed by expressing his anticipation of a retirement in which he enjoyed the fruits of the nation's "mutual cares, labors, and dangers" over the last several years. That is, "the benign influence of good laws nether a gratuitous government."8
Washington'south Farewell Address spoke to gimmicky concerns that the Marriage was weak and vulnerable to attacks from internal and external enemies. But even after the uncertainty of the early national menses had passed, his message of unity remained powerful. In the early nineteenth century, Federalists read the bye address aloud every bit part of their yearly commemoration of Washington's altogether.9 Information technology is all the same recited annually in the United States Senate, a tradition dating back to the Civil War. The Farewell Address endures as a critical founding document for issues of Marriage, partisanship, and isolationism.
Senator Tim Kaine discusses the reading of Washington'due south Farewell Address in Congress
Shira Lurie, Ph.D.
University College Fellow in Early American History
Departments of History and Canadian Studies, University of Toronto
Notes
1. James Roger Sharp, American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis (New Oasis: Yale Academy Printing, 1993), 139.
2.Washington's goodbye accost.New York, New York Public Library, 1935. pg. 105; 136. Courtesy of the Milstein Division of United States History, Local History & Genealogy, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations. For more information on the New York Public Library, run into the Library Guide.
three. Ibid.
4. Ibid.
5. Richard Hofstadter, The Idea of a Party System: The Rising of Legitimate Opposition in the U.s.a., 1780-1840 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969), 1-169.
6.Washington's farewell address.New York, New York Public Library, 1935. pg. 105; 136. Courtesy of the Milstein Division of Usa History, Local History & Genealogy, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations.
7. Ibid.
8. Ibid.
9. David Waldstreicher, In the Midst of Perpetual Fetes: The Making of American Nationalism, 1776-1820 (Chapel Hill: The Academy of North Carolina Press, 1997), 214-215.
Bibliography
Elkins, Stanley, and Eric McKitrick. The Historic period of Federalism. New York: Oxford University Printing, 1993, 489-497.
appeldortmationat.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/george-washington-s-farewell-address/
0 Response to "What 2 Warnings Did Washington Give to the People of the United States in His Farewell Address?"
Post a Comment